ZORC About Zwayer: Missing Balance Not Comprehensible

How many other Dortmund also annoyed Zorn especially the weak performance of referee Player (annoyed Zorc-Note 5.5) at the 2: 3 home defeat against record master Bayern Munich. Overall, it was a very good game of two very strong teams. Unfortunately, the referee did not have the same level, Zorn began talking to the annoyed Zorc: He decided at the end because he had no line. If I have some things pipe Or look at me, I have to do that on the other side.

Zorn thought of certain scenes. The hand game of Davies in the middle of the first half was more of a penalty than that of Mats Hummels, who is pressed on the shoulder and stumbling with the eyes closed, said the 59-year-old: This lack of balance is incomprehensible. Marco Reus becomes below Foot made, Mr. Player speaks exclusively from a high body contact. That too is incomprehensible and does not correspond to the facts. The non-uniformity of the evaluations will not meet a top game.

How to resolve  balance not zero and stock still exist error while closing any wbs

On the other hand, Zorn was done by the sporty. It was a game that two winners had earned or just none, said the Champions League winner of 1997: Football with courage to gap and one or the other mistake that both teams have made defensively too much. The first two goals were totally unnecessary in their genesis by individual mistakes. Zorn's conclusion turned back towards Player. It remains bitter that it is not decided in the end by one of the 30 players in the square, but by the referee.

At the very explosive case Jude Bellingham, Zorn slammed into the same notch as previously BVB-Boss Hans-Joachim Wake. I'm full of the player, that was a highly emotional situation, he was very disappointed and named only well-known facts, says Zorn on the English midfielder driver: He insults no one. Of course, he can discuss whether he has to say that But maybe one understands for an 18-year-old who feels in a high-pional situation — rightly — brought to the reward of his work.

ZORN refers to the annoyed Zorc interview

At its argument, Zorn also relied on a annoyed Zorc interview of Sunday: I'm not a lawyer, but referenced here to the expertise of Christoph Schickhardt, who knew clearly in the annoyed Zorc that the statement of Jew is capped by the free expression, And as far as I know, there are the right to freedom of expression in Germany. I do not know how to take Jude Bellingham.

Comments