New shooter looks like COD Warzone meets Battlefield, starts soon Closed Beta on Steam

Crowd looks like a mix battlefield and Call of Duty: War zone. The developers are known MFPP sizes in South Korea. A closed beta for Crowd will start soon on Steam. Mango tells you everything important.

Crowd is a new game on Steam of South Korean Morphs veterans. The closed beta for the game runs from 17 to 19 December 2021. Access to the Closed Beta can now be requested via Steam.

What's up? Crowd is a multiplayer shooter that is visually very much reminiscent of Call of Duty: War zone. But as Battlefield also has a great focus on vehicles like tanks, helicopters and armed jeeps. The story also reminds a little of the latest Battlefield:

The game has a modern war setting. You play mercenaries, who are known as the Crowd and fighting great nations in big battles. Your task is to find rare resources called Q-on.

The gameplay trailer for the game you can see here:

Developer had great success in South Korea

How can I play it? The game is soon playable in a closed beta. It takes place between the 17th and 19th of December 2021. To be able to participate, you must click on Request access on the Steam page under To participate in the Game Test of Crowd Play test (Via Steam).

Battlefield 2042 Gameplay ( 4K Ultra Graphics )

You can already request access now. The participants for the closed beta are randomly selected. With a little luck, you can already test Crowd on 17 December.

Who is responsible for the game? The game comes from the new developer studio Royal Crow. The head of the new studio is unknown in Germany. In South Korea, he is responsible for the large MOPS hit Sudden Attack. According to a presentation for investors, Sudden Attack had more than 23 million registered players in 2020. The game has taken more than 440 million euros at the time.

Crowd is not the only game, which is currently in a closed beta and reminiscent of Battlefield:

Polish shooter starts closed beta on Steam — reminiscent of Battlefield 2042, but is better

Comments